iLaw Leader Challenges PM, Threatens to Reveal Financial Evidence
iLaw leader Yingluck Achanunt says he holds only 5% of roughly 90,000 pages of evidence on alleged Senate election fraud, but warned he would publicly reveal financial details if defendants are acquitted despite clear proof.
On July 26, 2569, at Parliament, Yingluck Achanunt, manager of the iLaw (Internet for the People's Law) project, discussed preparations following the Prime Minister and Bhumjaithai Party's continued lawsuits against him. He stated that vast evidence related to Senate election fraud schemes exists in the files of the Election Commission and the Special Cases Investigation Department—approximately 90,000 pages total—of which his organization possesses only 5%. The information he has publicly disclosed represents merely a fraction of what is available. If the Election Commission orders prosecution, all evidence will be presented in court through proper legal procedures. Should any defendant be acquitted despite clear evidence, he warned he would have no choice but to publicly reveal related financial transaction information.
When asked about an invitation from Suksomruay Wandontiyakul, Amnat Charoen MP and Bhumjaithai minister, to visit Amnat Charoen province, Achanunt said he would not hesitate to go if needed to present facts. He reiterated that if the accused comes forward and clarifies everything fully, the matter would be resolved. However, he stressed that he possesses far more information than what he has already disclosed publicly and that witness testimony remains credible regardless of accusations that witnesses are unreliable.
Regarding claims that he might acknowledge some information could be inaccurate, Achanunt stated he has sources for all his data and verification systems in place. While some details might prove incorrect upon scrutiny, he emphasized there is no malicious intent. He noted that the nine individuals he named have far more associated evidence than he has revealed, and he called on the opposition to investigate and present findings to court. He maintained he has no power beyond what he has already done and that responsibility lies with the opposition.
