The Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation has clarified its approach to national park passport stamps, firmly denying rumors that the popular collection program is being discontinued. In response to misinformation spreading on social media, the department confirmed the activity will proceed normally with standardized guidelines applied nationwide, effective from a June 11, 2026 departmental directive.

Stamping will now occur only at designated visitor service centers or locations specified by individual parks, with stamping prohibited at toll booths and during park closure hours to maintain order and reduce congestion. The department clarified there are no bans on visitor signatures accompanying stamps or restrictions on owning multiple passport booklets. However, officials may decline stamps if they observe an unusually large number of booklets without clear fellow travelers, to preserve the program's spirit of encouraging independent park tourism.

Director Saysudjai Chunehaworawut stated the stamp-collection initiative remains popular and inspires nature tourism. The parks will continue supporting collectors while improving service points to ensure proper staff oversight and signature verification. Thailand currently operates 156 national parks. Visitors collecting stamps from all 156 parks with complete staff signatures and dates can claim a souvenir at the parks management tourism division. The public is encouraged to continue touring Thailand's national parks while complying with local procedures. During the transition to new service locations, some areas are still communicating with staff, and the department will expedite uniform implementation nationwide. For more information, contact the Tourism and Recreation Management Division at 02 561 0777 extension 1742 during business hours.

Singer Damrong Wongthong has firmly denied being implicated in a scandal involving a well-known pre-1990s country music artist who filed for divorce after allegedly having a relationship with a foreign woman, which his wife discovered at a resort. Internet users mistakenly linked multiple singers with similar names to the story, including Damrong Wongthong.

Damrong gave an interview confirming he is not the person in the news and stated his marriage remains loving and understanding. He acknowledged that the person at the center of the scandal once came to him seeking emotional support about their relationship troubles, putting him in an awkward position. However, he declined to judge anyone, noting that personal matters between two people are complex and no outsider knows the full details spanning decades.

When asked about being mistakenly named, Damrong said he was surprised but not worried. "I heard the news like everyone else, but honestly, who?" he replied. He confirmed his wife and he love and understand each other well. Fans did reach out with questions, but Damrong said he has no fear of being misunderstood because he has done nothing wrong.

Regarding whether he had spoken to the person involved, Damrong said there had been some conversation on one side but less on the other. When the person came to him seeking support, they described their long relationship and expressed pain over how their partner had changed. "They seemed to want me to talk to the other person on their behalf," Damrong explained. However, he refused to intervene, saying he does not know the full details of their 20 to 30 years together and cannot judge. He acknowledged feeling awkward being caught in the middle but prefers to stay out of others' personal matters and maintain normal conversation. When asked how long he and his wife have been together and what keeps their marriage strong, Damrong said the key is doing good things and staying on the right path. He firmly reiterated: "It's definitely not us."

On August 3, 2025, Bangkok Metropolitan Assembly officials Suthichai Veerakulsunthon from Jomthong district and Naphapol Jirakul from Bangkoknoi district questioned the case of Pattrasak Niempraneth, a Phaya Thai district assembly member from the People's Party, who allegedly cast a vote for absent colleague Sairam Prakaikit of Sathorn district during a July 31 council session on amended assembly procedural rules.

The vote count showed 42 votes with only 41 members physically present in the chamber. Pattrasak later admitted to casting the proxy vote. System checks revealed that Sairam's voting card remained inserted in the machine despite his absence, a procedure that should have been prevented by removing the card.

Suthichai stated the incident constitutes a serious violation that cannot be overlooked, as assembly rules strictly prohibit proxy voting. Each vote represents law-making that affects the public, and claims of machine malfunction or operator error are unacceptable. Officials must be notified to fix problems rather than having members vote for one another.

Naphapol noted the action violates Section 157, carrying sentences of 1-10 years imprisonment and potential lifetime loss of political rights. Both the person who cast the proxy vote and the absent member who consented bear responsibility. Sairam's failure to object or deny involvement after learning of the proxy vote constitutes complicity in concealing wrongdoing.

On August 5, the Democrat Party will file a complaint with the National Anti-Corruption Commission and notify the Interior Ministry, potentially triggering an investigation and removal proceedings. Historical precedent from parliamentary cases shows courts typically impose prison sentences without suspended sentences for proxy voting violations, considered a serious breach of public representation.

MP Phawut Pongwittayapanu and actor Film Rathaphoom Tokkongthrap reported to the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) at 2 p.m. on August 3, 2569 to face charges related to unauthorized forex trading. Phawut appeared at the DSI's second floor lobby wearing a suit and dark blue jeans, accompanied by legal counsel and holding brown document folders. He avoided media questions, with his team stating he would grant interviews after completing his statement to investigators. Actor Film had arrived earlier in the morning and remained in the interrogation room at the DSI's Technology and Information Crime Division on the ninth floor. Both suspects face multiple charges including conspiracy to commit fraud, operating unlicensed securities and futures trading businesses without registration, inputting false computer data likely to cause public harm, and money laundering through conspiracy.

Sirikanya Tansakul, a Pheu Thai list MP and deputy party leader, insisted the party made the right choice supporting Anutin as prime minister to keep Palang Pracharath in power, while stressing she has not ruled out negotiations with the red and green factions over government formation. She downplayed the premier's assertion that he fears no no-confidence debate, noting that public bravado is expected but cautioning that opposition evidence could pose a real threat to government stability.

Speaking at parliament on August 3, Tansakul acknowledged that even without a secret deal between red and green factions, the three-month-old government faces instability rooted in numerous problems including corruption allegations, parliamentary irregularities, and administrative mismanagement—issues she believes may already be making coalition partners reconsider their commitment. She indicated Pheu Thai would table no-confidence motions under Articles 151 and 152 in the coming parliamentary session, pending discussions with opposition allies on timing and procedure.

When asked whether red and green votes alone would be insufficient and require orange (Pheu Thai) support to topple the government, Tansakul confirmed the math works that way, leaving open the possibility of negotiations. However, she firmly closed the door to the blue faction (Democrat Party), saying they would not approach Pheu Thai, and ruled out replacing the green faction with orange in any new coalition, citing ethical objections to Palang Pracharath's leadership.

On August 3, 2025, at Parliament, Kraiwut Prasitanantakul, an Ang Thong MP and Bhumjaithai Party executive board member, discussed the lawsuit against Yingchip Archananth, the iLaw director who disclosed evidence in a Senate vote-buying case that mentioned Kraiwut's name. He said he retained a lawyer in Ang Thong Province to pursue the case.

Kraiwut noted that being accused alongside the party as an executive board member made it necessary to pursue legal action, even if he would not have been bothered by a personal accusation alone. He stated that all allegations are old and contained no new information when Yingchip made his statement. As a person accused—not a suspect—Kraiwut said he has already provided information and clarified the matter with the Election Commission (EC). He believes the EC will rule fairly and impartially, focusing on whether solid evidence exists rather than treating the case as an emotional or political issue.

When asked if he worried the case might be taken out of context, Kraiwut said he hopes the EC will decide on principles of fairness for all parties. If there is evidence such as financial trails, he wants the EC to investigate transparently and resolve doubts. He emphasized that Bhumjaithai leaders and executives have been made defendants in public opinion but maintain their innocence and have done nothing wrong. Though parts of society have already judged them, he appealed for fairness and said the party stands ready to cooperate with the EC, expressing no concern but hoping for a straightforward ruling.