Pisit Challenges 'Thaeng' to Clarify What 'Blue System' Means, Threatens Legal Action Over Defamation Allegations
Senate spokesperson Pisit challenges Pheu Thai representative Nattapong to clarify his "blue system" accusation against the Senate, threatening legal action for defamation while rejecting claims of institutional conflict between parliament
At 11:35 a.m. on May 27, 2569, Senate spokesperson Pisit Apisatwanapong addressed the case of Nattapong Ruengpanya, a list-based House representative and Pheu Thai party leader, who posted on Facebook accusing the Senate of undermining key democratic principles by functioning as a 'blue system.' Eighty-nine senators subsequently issued a statement demanding an apology within three days, which Nattapong stated he did not anticipate providing.
Regarding the connection between the 'blue system' narrative and the Senate, Pisit said he did not know what Nattapong meant by the term and questioned whether Thailand even has such a system. "We have only one system—a democratic system with the King as head of state, which is clear," Pisit stated. He urged Nattapong to clarify what the 'blue system' means, as ambiguous language could cause public confusion and potentially incite social division.
Pisit directly challenged Nattapong, saying: "Tell us clearly what your 'blue system' means. Don't use language that requires public interpretation. As a House representative and party leader, you should be precise, transparent, and honest. Stop speaking in ways that confuse society or risk promoting division and unrest."
When asked if the situation represents conflict between the two chambers of parliament, Pisit rejected this characterization, stating that Nattapong's views are personal opinions, not positions of the House. He emphasized that not all Pheu Thai members share Nattapong's views and that the Senate does not view this as institutional conflict between chambers.
Pisit confirmed that the matter will not affect the Senate's legislative work, distinguishing between Nattapong's personal expressions and his official duties. He stated the Senate will consult legal advisors on how to proceed, noting that lawmakers and constitutional drafting remain the shared responsibility of both chambers.