Interior Ministry Chief Rebukes Former Official Over Corruption Claims
Interior Ministry Permanent Secretary Arsit Sampantharat defended the ministry against criticism from his predecessor Sutthiphong Chunlueren, asserting that the ministry is not shameful and has resolved problems quickly. He said past exam‑corruption issues were not addressed earlier, but his office has launched seven‑day investigations and filed charges. Arsit urged Sutthiphong to give feedback directly rather than through the media and noted that several former officials have praised his efforts.
Arsit Sampantharat, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Interior, responded to criticism from his predecessor Sutthiphong Chunlueren, asserting that the ministry is not shameful and that he welcomes direct suggestions rather than comments made through the media. Speaking at the Government House on October 13, 2026 at 11:20 am, Arsit said that since assuming his post he believes everything is functioning well, that problems have been addressed as quickly and effectively as possible, and that earlier periods may have been more embarrassing. He emphasized his efforts to boost morale and ensure fairness among civil servants, citing the local administration department where he ordered a seven‑day fact‑finding investigation, which has been completed and led to charges against those found responsible. Arsit stated that the ministry has done everything it can, and if anyone considers it shameful they should point out the specific shortcomings, noting that several former permanent secretaries have called to congratulate him on his swift problem‑solving. Regarding Sutthiphong’s alleged phone calls of encouragement, Arsit said he has only seen Sutthiphong give interviews to the media and has not spoken with him directly. He added that Interior Minister Anutin Charnvirakul has expressed confidence in his leadership and believes the ministry is working diligently to resolve all issues. On the no‑confidence debate involving Anutin, Arsit said the ministry possesses the necessary evidence and documentation to respond appropriately. When asked whether he feels hurt by Sutthiphong’s remarks, Arsit replied that he has learned to distinguish right from wrong, and that if anyone has concerns or suggestions they should tell him directly rather than airing them publicly, as he believes that is the proper course. He stressed that he does not want anyone to claim the ministry is terrible, insisting that any faults are isolated and that the ministry’s duty is to resolve issues internally. When questioned about whether the criticism is constructive or destructive, Arsit said people differ and he cannot know others’ motives, but he himself would not act in that manner. On past allegations of corruption in local examinations, Arsit said he has never heard of any action taken previously, and that he has initiated the fact‑finding committee and filed charges against those responsible.
