Lawmaker Urges Strict Review of Duplicate Government Spending
A Bangkok MP is pushing for stricter scrutiny of government spending, flagging wasteful seminars, public relations campaigns, and consultant fees that lack clear public benefit ahead of the 2570 budget approval.
At Parliament on July 31, 2569, Phanthit Nuamjerm, a Bangkok MP from the People's Party and member of a subcommittee reviewing the 2570 budget appropriations bill, reported on the committee's progress and raised concerns about spending practices. He called on each government agency to justify why expenditures on seminars, conferences, public relations, consultant fees, overseas travel, and contracted services are necessary and truly beneficial to the public.
Phanthit specifically flagged seminars whose purpose is unclear, overseas academic conferences, public relations initiatives measured only by reach metrics, foreign travel with unclear outcomes, and excessive reliance on outsourced consultant work when permanent staff should be able to handle tasks themselves. He emphasized that the committee's role is not to obstruct government operations but to question whether non-core expenditures represent good value for taxpayer money.
"I propose we reduce seminars of unknown purpose, cut back on public relations measured by clicks alone, and question costly foreign travel when Thailand's budget situation is what it is," Phanthit said. He noted that his team bases decisions on detailed budget documents, not feelings, examining every project's funding, budget execution, redundancies, unit costs, performance indicators, and public outcomes. However, many agencies have failed to provide complete supporting documentation or adequate answers to the committee's questions, citing examples such as the Office for Promotion of National Reform, Strategy, and National Reconciliation, whose mandate overlaps significantly with other agencies.
