Senate Chair Denies Reports of Blocking Clean Air Bill, Proposes Joint Committee to Address Differences
Senate Chairman Wutthichai Kalyanamitra denied blocking the Clean Air Bill and proposed a joint committee between both houses to resolve disagreements over implementation timelines and stakeholder protections.
At 9:25 AM on May 6, 2025, at Parliament, Senate Chairman Wutthichai Kalyanamitra, presiding over the special committee reviewing the Clean Air Bill, addressed the Cabinet's decision to resubmit the draft to Parliament. He explained that tri-party meetings involving the government, opposition, and Senate would be scheduled to confirm the bill. Wutthichai expressed agreement with the Cabinet's move, noting that the government prioritizes this legislation as a fundamental right for all citizens to breathe clean air.
He confirmed the review would proceed as quickly as possible while following proper procedures, and stated that today's Senate session would discuss whether the original committee should continue or if a new joint committee between both houses should be established. Wutthichai firmly denied rumors that the Senate would reject the Clean Air Bill, explaining that the Senate raised concerns about ensuring all stakeholders—both beneficiaries and those affected—are considered in the bill's content. He emphasized that all Senate members agree the legislation benefits the public.
Regarding the bill's current draft from the House, Wutthichai noted some articles the Senate disagrees with, making a joint committee possible. He stated this shouldn't take long since many provisions have already been reviewed. The Senate will base its consideration on the public interest. He rejected suggestions that the Senate's review would not serve its intended purpose, noting that public representatives participate in committee deliberations and consistently align with public interests.
On implementation timelines, Wutthichai stated: "We believe businesses need reasonable adjustment periods suited to their operations—not abrupt cutoffs that would destroy industries. If you can't adapt, we can't accept that either. There must be appropriate timeframes, carbon dioxide limits, and pollution standards that reduce gradually. If targets aren't met, there must be penalties, fines, or ultimately business closure."
When asked about past claims that the Clean Air Bill failed due to favoritism toward big business, Wutthichai rejected the term, asserting that the Senate based its decisions on reason and facts. He emphasized the need to balance citizens' right to clean air with fair treatment for businesses that must adapt. He proposed establishing procedures with timelines of 6 months to 1 year, with relevant agencies monitoring compliance with established standards.
