A dharma teaching from Luang Pho Cha Suphatho of Wat Nong Pa Phong in Ubon Ratchathani states: "Practice goes against the current—against our own inclination and against defilement." The article explores the "Phra Somdet Leb Mue" (Fingernail Buddha amulet), a highly revered sacred object from the late Luang Pho Phong Thammacho, former abbot of Wat Kuha Sawan on Bangkok's Thonburi side. Two versions exist: the first cast around 1914 with a smooth back, and the second from 1921 featuring a sunburst pattern, with fewer than 5,000 pieces produced combined.

The amulet features a mold resembling a fingertip or glass cover, with a Buddha figure in diamond meditation pose wearing robes above a thick base. The material is fine, smooth white powder. Though less famous than other sacred objects from renowned monks, these amulets are primarily held by Thonburi residents, especially in the Phasi Charoen area, who guard them jealously.

The article also discusses related commemorative coins, including a coin series by Luang Pho Ham Kesaro of Wat Krang in Samkok, Pathum Thani, cast in 1926 for a rice-blessing ceremony. Additionally, a "Luang Pu Pian" amulet coin from 1929 commemorates the 67th birthday of Luang Pu Pian Inthasaro, former abbot of Wat Chaiyachumpol Chana Songkhram in Kanchanaburi. The article concludes with a 1916 amulet coin of Luang Pu Iamr from Wat Don Khuang in Uthai Thani, cast to commemorate the monk's 72nd birthday.

On July 15, Prime Minister Anuthín Charnvírakul and Interior Ministry Permanent Secretary Artsíts Sámphanrat attended a meeting to review progress in the local government civil service exam fraud investigation following the arrest of three suspects, including director Pichít. The national police chief and senior law enforcement officials participated alongside representatives from the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), the Public Sector Anti-Corruption Commission (PACC), the Interior Ministry, and related agencies.

Deputy National Police Chief Natsasák reported that evidence links all three suspects, who allegedly falsified data entered into computer systems and altered exam scores, leading to their arrest. All three suspects have denied the charges. Police are actively investigating masterminds and co-conspirators based on evidence from nine search locations, including documents, digital evidence, and witness statements.

Natsasák said that during questioning, one suspect mentioned meeting with staff from Srinakharinwirot University's Prasanmit campus. Police are investigating whether this contact relates to the fraud, but emphasized this is only the suspect's statement and lacks sufficient evidence to charge the university employee. No state officials have been linked so far, though anyone implicated will face prosecution and referral to the NACC for corruption charges.

Permanent Secretary Artsíts reported that of 15,520 exam passers, 14,988 have reported. Comparing raw scores from answer sheets with announced results revealed discrepancies for 5,814 people: 3,621 should have failed but were given passing scores; 1,713 passed but had scores inflated to improve ranking; and 480 cases involved scanning errors requiring verification against NACC-seized answer sheets.

Prime Minister Anuthín said he previously challenged the central civil service selection committee and requested delayed reporting from passers pending fact-checking, but once matters enter the committee's jurisdiction, everything must proceed by law and committee authority. In his personal view, if exam fraud is proven from the beginning, all involved passers should be disqualified. He confirmed the government will pursue all legal avenues and consult with the justice system to ensure fairness for unaffected test-takers.

Anuthín announced appointment of a separate case-monitoring committee chaired by Deputy Prime Minister Pakorn Nílpraphan, including the national police commander, representatives from the NACC, PACC, and the Office of the Ombudsman, along with the Justice Minister and related officials.

Entrepreneur Yui-Veena Tasnai has successfully transformed ordinary pandan leaf into a premium product ready to compete in global markets. Initially a baker importing French butter and Belgian chocolate, she pivoted during the COVID-19 pandemic to embrace local Thai ingredients, choosing pandan leaf for its accessibility, fast growth, and distinctly Thai aroma. When her father, the original pandan farmer, suffered an accident, she nearly gave up but continued under his guidance, gradually learning to cultivate and expand the crop.

She partnered with organic farmers in Phichit province, establishing clear standards for leaf harvesting, size, age, and timing with documented SOPs. The partnership benefits farmers with supplementary income while ensuring quality raw materials. Her current network includes about 10 farmers, with plans to expand further toward official organic certification. She recently purchased an additional 4 rai of land to build a learning center and dedicate 1 rai specifically for pandan cultivation as a sustainable production base and educational resource.

Pandan's key advantage is that one planting yields harvests for 10 years, with new shoots emerging every month after cutting. Her brand has expanded internationally, recently achieving top-three rankings in Hong Kong through a startup support program. Fresh pandan exports command higher prices but face quality issues from freezing that degrades aroma and color. In response, she developed premium pandan powder that retains approximately 80% of fresh leaf flavor and aroma while solving storage problems—opening significant opportunities for Hong Kong and Chinese markets.

On July 15, 2569, the radio program Khon Kra-Aew discussed a complaint by resident Khun Phai, who says he has suffered greatly from his neighbor's disruptive conduct, including loud Buddhist chanting, drumming, and guitar playing, with the worst being the throwing of foul-smelling curry bags.

Khun Phai, accompanied by his parents, explained that the adjacent house was originally occupied by the neighbor's father (whom he called Khun Akon). When Khun Akon lived there, there were no problems and they were good neighbors. However, once Khun Akon's son—the defendant Khun Aek—moved in, the noise began and problems erupted. The disturbances became so severe that even Khun Akon could not stay, his siblings had to move him out, and Khun Aek's wife also had to leave. Khun Phai said his mother, who has a heart condition, has been severely affected, waking at night to take medicine and struggling to return to sleep. She is now under significant stress.

"We've reported this to the district office and police, but nothing has been resolved," Khun Phai said. "The behavior has actually escalated. The worst part is the foul-smelling curry bags thrown almost every other day. We've installed CCTV and clearly captured a hand throwing from his house."

Khun Aek then called the radio program to respond. He said he runs a second-hand musical instrument business and insisted the chanting was at normal volume. He argued that claims about noise levels should be measured with proper instruments—otherwise anyone could claim something is loud. He denied making noise late at night, saying that if he told someone to sleep, he would also need to sleep himself. Although the program played a recording of loud noise at 2 a.m., Khun Aek denied responsibility and offered to let investigators check his own CCTV footage.

Khun Aek claimed he too was a victim, with people breaking into his home, removing windows, and causing property damage. When asked about throwing curry bags, Khun Aek first denied it, but when confronted with footage and pressed on who else could have thrown it, he eventually admitted: "Ah, okay, yes I did." He said he did it out of anger because people had broken into his home multiple times.

Khun Aek described his own suffering: he has been burglarized multiple times since 2559 with no resolution or accountability. He invited investigators to visit his home to see the actual situation, rather than judge based on one side and emotions. He asked who would be responsible for the damage he has suffered if he did nothing.

When asked about a recent knocking on his wall early in the morning, Khun Aek denied knowledge and blamed rats, then countered by asking whether others must sleep while he cannot.

Koh Samui has been named the World's Best Island for 2026 in the “World's Best Awards 2026” by international travel magazine “Travel + Leisure.” The southern island earned a reader score of 95...

CHIANG MAI — A karaoke bar in Chiang Mai has agreed to fully refund nearly 150,000 baht (approximately $4,471 USD) to two British tourists following a dispute over charges the visitors claimed were excessive. The business initially maintained that the charges reflected actual services provided and their standard rates.

The dispute arose after the British tourists, accompanied by a lawyer, filed a complaint alleging they had been overcharged during a visit to a karaoke venue in the city. The Thai wife of one of the tourists, along with their lawyer, met with investigators at Chiang Mai City Police Station. Police summoned representatives from both the tourists and the karaoke bar for questioning on the night of 13 July and encouraged them to reach a mutual settlement.

The incident occurred on 28 June when a British man living in Hang Dong district and a British friend went for food and drinks in the Nimmanhemin area before heading to a karaoke bar in Chiang Mai's old city. According to the tourist's wife, both men were heavily intoxicated. After initially paying less than 1,000 baht for their first visit, staff allegedly persuaded them to stay. The husband eventually threatened to call police before they were allowed to leave.

Later, a tuk-tuk driver took the friend to his hotel, but instead of taking the husband home to Hang Dong, allegedly returned him to the same karaoke bar while he was too intoxicated to make sound decisions. The following day, the couple discovered charges exceeding 120,000 baht on the husband's credit card and an additional 26,000 baht on his wife's card, totaling nearly 150,000 baht. They subsequently filed a police complaint.

After coordinating with their banks, the couple discovered multiple transactions processed in quick succession, with some payments transferred to an individual's PromptPay account rather than a business account. They also noted that one credit card had been charged beyond its 50,000-baht spending limit. The karaoke bar explained that the customers had requested numerous female hostesses at 700 baht per person per hour over approximately four to five hours. However, the tourists disputed the amount, arguing the charges were disproportionately high and questioning why multiple payments of varying amounts had been processed instead of a single transaction.