On July 15, 2569, the radio program Khon Kra-Aew discussed a complaint by resident Khun Phai, who says he has suffered greatly from his neighbor's disruptive conduct, including loud Buddhist chanting, drumming, and guitar playing, with the worst being the throwing of foul-smelling curry bags.

Khun Phai, accompanied by his parents, explained that the adjacent house was originally occupied by the neighbor's father (whom he called Khun Akon). When Khun Akon lived there, there were no problems and they were good neighbors. However, once Khun Akon's son—the defendant Khun Aek—moved in, the noise began and problems erupted. The disturbances became so severe that even Khun Akon could not stay, his siblings had to move him out, and Khun Aek's wife also had to leave. Khun Phai said his mother, who has a heart condition, has been severely affected, waking at night to take medicine and struggling to return to sleep. She is now under significant stress.

"We've reported this to the district office and police, but nothing has been resolved," Khun Phai said. "The behavior has actually escalated. The worst part is the foul-smelling curry bags thrown almost every other day. We've installed CCTV and clearly captured a hand throwing from his house."

Khun Aek then called the radio program to respond. He said he runs a second-hand musical instrument business and insisted the chanting was at normal volume. He argued that claims about noise levels should be measured with proper instruments—otherwise anyone could claim something is loud. He denied making noise late at night, saying that if he told someone to sleep, he would also need to sleep himself. Although the program played a recording of loud noise at 2 a.m., Khun Aek denied responsibility and offered to let investigators check his own CCTV footage.

Khun Aek claimed he too was a victim, with people breaking into his home, removing windows, and causing property damage. When asked about throwing curry bags, Khun Aek first denied it, but when confronted with footage and pressed on who else could have thrown it, he eventually admitted: "Ah, okay, yes I did." He said he did it out of anger because people had broken into his home multiple times.

Khun Aek described his own suffering: he has been burglarized multiple times since 2559 with no resolution or accountability. He invited investigators to visit his home to see the actual situation, rather than judge based on one side and emotions. He asked who would be responsible for the damage he has suffered if he did nothing.

When asked about a recent knocking on his wall early in the morning, Khun Aek denied knowledge and blamed rats, then countered by asking whether others must sleep while he cannot.

Koh Samui has been named the World's Best Island for 2026 in the “World's Best Awards 2026” by international travel magazine “Travel + Leisure.” The southern island earned a reader score of 95...

CHIANG MAI — A karaoke bar in Chiang Mai has agreed to fully refund nearly 150,000 baht (approximately $4,471 USD) to two British tourists following a dispute over charges the visitors claimed were excessive. The business initially maintained that the charges reflected actual services provided and their standard rates.

The dispute arose after the British tourists, accompanied by a lawyer, filed a complaint alleging they had been overcharged during a visit to a karaoke venue in the city. The Thai wife of one of the tourists, along with their lawyer, met with investigators at Chiang Mai City Police Station. Police summoned representatives from both the tourists and the karaoke bar for questioning on the night of 13 July and encouraged them to reach a mutual settlement.

The incident occurred on 28 June when a British man living in Hang Dong district and a British friend went for food and drinks in the Nimmanhemin area before heading to a karaoke bar in Chiang Mai's old city. According to the tourist's wife, both men were heavily intoxicated. After initially paying less than 1,000 baht for their first visit, staff allegedly persuaded them to stay. The husband eventually threatened to call police before they were allowed to leave.

Later, a tuk-tuk driver took the friend to his hotel, but instead of taking the husband home to Hang Dong, allegedly returned him to the same karaoke bar while he was too intoxicated to make sound decisions. The following day, the couple discovered charges exceeding 120,000 baht on the husband's credit card and an additional 26,000 baht on his wife's card, totaling nearly 150,000 baht. They subsequently filed a police complaint.

After coordinating with their banks, the couple discovered multiple transactions processed in quick succession, with some payments transferred to an individual's PromptPay account rather than a business account. They also noted that one credit card had been charged beyond its 50,000-baht spending limit. The karaoke bar explained that the customers had requested numerous female hostesses at 700 baht per person per hour over approximately four to five hours. However, the tourists disputed the amount, arguing the charges were disproportionately high and questioning why multiple payments of varying amounts had been processed instead of a single transaction.

Police arrested two Laotian suspects on July 15 in connection with a major heroin trafficking operation that supplied drugs to Australia through a Thai network. The investigation began after 26-year-old Armina was caught smuggling heroin into Australia, leading authorities to identify four additional key Thai operatives: a delivery driver who transported packages to Armina's condominium, a friend who helped destroy evidence hidden in an elephant-embroidered bag, Ekawitthaya who operated a LINE account under the alias "Rin Rin" and served as a command-level organizer, and Chantra who used the Facebook account "Rose Rose" to coordinate the smuggling of 12 bags with Armina.

Three Laotian nationals were identified as the masterminds directing the smuggling operation: Saiyane (or Thao Saiyane) Buarappai, Nan Buarappai, and Un (or Thao Un) Naotharat. Thai authorities confirmed that Laotian officials have arrested Saiyane and Nan, while Un remains at large. Rather than extradite the suspects to Thailand immediately, Thai and Laotian authorities agreed to pursue further investigation in Laos to identify higher-level international drug trafficking organizations involved in the operation.

Investigators revealed that over the past two to three years, the three Laotian suspects worked with Thai national Utit and Laotian national Thatsaporn, a married couple, in a recurring smuggling scheme. The drugs were transferred at a spot beneath a fig tree on the Thai side of the Mekong River in Loei Province, where Thai operatives would collect packages containing heroin and deliver them to transport companies for distribution across Thailand. This network successfully moved multiple drug shipments into Bangkok's inner areas.

The Cabinet has approved a further revision of Thailand’s visa-exemption measures and visa privileges, as proposed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The objective is to ensure that travel facilita...

On July 15, 2569, at 13:50 at Parliament, Piyarat Jongthep, a Pheu Thai party list MP, disclosed a scheme involving Chinese nationals obtaining Thai citizenship through private hospitals and district officials. He described it as another instance revealing corruption in Thailand's bureaucracy and public health system, particularly regarding the citizenship registration process. Piyarat noted this is significant because police are conducting cleanup operations against the network, with arrests totaling over 70 billion baht in asset seizures that have extended to suspects' families. In one case, a suspect's wife received money into her account, and although she had three children, all three became Thai citizens, prompting further investigation.

Piyarat disclosed details of another similar case involving a Chinese woman who gave birth in Thailand. The case involves a sixth private hospital in the Rama 9 area. According to the birth certificate provided by a well-intentioned official, the child is a girl with the surname Tang, born to a Chinese mother. The registered father is listed as a 22-year-old Thai national, while the mother is 36 years old. The birth occurred in July 2566 and was reported by hospital staff who handled the registration directly with district officials.

Piyarat questioned whether the hospital offered a package service where staff would arrange birth registration at the district office after delivery. The certificate submitted to obtain the birth certificate lacked even a birth notification form, yet the district registrar signed off alone, despite procedures requiring signatures from both the operating officer and the registrar. This suggests the registrar took full responsibility. The girl now has Thai nationality and would be two years old if still in Thailand. Although her father is Thai, she is ethnically Chinese through her mother, making it highly likely she was a surrogate arrangement given the father's extensive criminal record. Police are currently pursuing the case.

Piyarat called for three actions: First, the scheme has operated since 2566 and may have continued for years with coordination between government officials and private hospital staff. Second, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, as Interior Minister overseeing civil registration, cannot avoid responsibility and must establish a committee to investigate all involved agencies, as no investigation process has been visible. Third, regarding Bangkok Governor Chadchart Sittipunt and relevant officials, action is needed to prevent Chinese mothers from taking children out of the country.