PM Denies Favoritism In Local Election Corruption Probe
Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul denied favoritism in the 2568 local election fraud probe, saying multiple government agencies are investigating separately to ensure fairness before cases converge at a fact-finding committee.
At a press conference on July 6, 2025, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul stated that investigations into the 2568 local election fraud cases involve committees at multiple levels. Deputy PM Pakorn Nilpraband chairs a fact-finding committee under the PM's Office, while Interior Ministry Permanent Secretary Arthit Sampatratana reported establishing serious disciplinary inquiry panels for potentially involved civil servants. The Central Investigation Police Bureau and the Office of Public Sector Anti-Corruption Commission are also conducting parallel investigations.
"It's actually fair," the PM said, explaining that each violation falls under different government agencies' jurisdiction for proper fact-finding before prosecution. All information will ultimately converge at the fact-finding committee to ensure no favoritism or interference occurs.
When asked about duplicate names among those under investigation, Anutin refused to disclose details, citing classified status. He confirmed that the Interior Ministry's Permanent Secretary signed the serious disciplinary investigation orders this afternoon.
Anutin clarified that Pakorn's committee operates on behalf of the PM's Office and cannot prosecute independently, as members are not authorized officials. The committee's role is investigative oversight, with panel members including the Secretary-General of the Council of State, the AAPTC Secretary-General, the National Police Commissioner, and the Supreme Public Prosecutor.
Regarding immediate suspension of those under investigation, the PM explained that procedures are being followed case-by-case. Some have been reassigned to remove them from their positions, but all actions adhere to legal standards and available evidence. Where cases are clear-cut, action will be swift; where witnesses or further examination are needed, proper channels will be followed with all units working in parallel.
On outcomes, Anutin stated that verified violations involving bribery or misconduct affecting election results will become the basis for further investigation and legal prosecution in all forms.
