Deputy Speaker Defends Microphone Cutoff During Parliament Debate

On the morning of September 3, 2025, at Parliament, Mallika Chirathivat, First Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, issued a statement explaining the decision to cut off MP Pattrapong Leelaphat's microphone while he was debating the Clean Air Management Bill, after he used vulgar language.

Mallika clarified that the incident occurred during consideration of the Clean Air Management Bill, an important public benefit law that both government and opposition MPs were discussing. All parties had agreed to complete debate by the evening of September 2, with each speaker limited to five minutes to prevent delays. A joint committee of 20 members—10 from each chamber—was formed to reconcile amendments sent back from the Senate, which most MPs opposed.

Several MPs made comments touching on Senate issues, but they did so within the five-minute time limit. "If any member speaks over time, their microphone is cut off regardless," Mallika said. "While parliamentary speech is a privilege, it is the duty of the presiding officer to maintain order, ensure respectful language, and enforce time limits for orderly proceedings."

Mallika emphasized that the incident was a matter of time discipline, not a content dispute, and stressed there was no conflict between MPs and the Speaker or any political party. The presiding officer has a responsibility to ensure meetings proceed smoothly and finish within the time frame both blocs have agreed to.

Parliamentary rules clearly state that members must not use disrespectful language, and if violated, the Speaker may require withdrawal of remarks to maintain meeting decorum. Since proceedings are broadcast live and watched by the public, crude language sets a poor example for youth and the general public.

When asked if this microphone cutoff measure would be applied to other debates, Mallika noted that time limits are already set for every session, and MPs prepare in advance to stay within the frame. She confirmed that MPs are allowed to mention Senate issues, as many do, but the key issue is maintaining the time limit.

Regarding concerns about whether the crude language would be raised with the MP's parent party, Mallika said that on the night of September 2, she had to ask the member to withdraw his remarks, and she urged the use of respectful language because the microphone carries the sound. If such matters are overlooked or allowed to pass, the Speaker will be criticized for failing to properly control the meeting.