Donor Urges Police Probe into Good Deeds Foundation Finances
The user wants a short summary of the article, 1-2 sentences, 120-220 characters, max 240. Output English only, plain text, no markdown, no labels. Key points: Donor Oi Sree (Bunyanut Saengsri) and lawyer Phuwakorn Si-nian gave testimony to
Oi Sree insists even a 5-baht donation can be verified, dismisses claims of seeking publicity, and denies personal conflict with Boom Panadda. She notes that the resignation of Good Deeds Foundation committee members has no effect because the offense is already complete.
On October 31, 2026, at the Central Investigation Bureau, Bunyanut Saengsri (Oi Sree), owner of Oi Sree and Phueng Phueak Legal Consulting Co., Ltd., along with Phuwakorn Si-nian, partner of HETA, an organizational ethics, foundation, and media representative acting for victims, went to give additional testimony to investigators of Division 4, Economic Crime Suppression Division. They requested an examination of the operations and financial trail of the Good Deeds Foundation, which has Natchapada Wongphudi (Boom Panadda) as chairwoman.
Bunyanut revealed that she came to clarify details in her capacity as a donor victim, confirming that her actions were not staging, publicity-seeking, or personal bias. Although her total donation was only 1,000 baht, even a 5-baht transfer counts as a donation and she must verify it because it was donated with pure intent.
"It is not staging or publicity-seeking, but the question is whether Boom used the money with purity. I want the justice process to prove whether Natchapada received donations and used them according to the purposes posted in the invitation. I confirm I never had a personal conflict with Natchapada, even though I have criticized her performance in the past, but that was criticism based on evidence."
Bunyanut added that regarding criticism that police are rushing the case, she believes she should have been questioned since yesterday (October 30) but obstacles delayed her appearance until today. Currently there are four co-complainants, and they are waiting for additional victims to come forward.
Bunyanut raised key observations about the Good Deeds Foundation's financial system as follows: 1. Only one account was found in the foundation's name; the other two are personal accounts with Natchapada's name attached. 2. For transfers exceeding 50,000 baht, the bank requires a facial scan of the foundation chairwoman to approve the transaction, so it is impossible that the chairwoman was unaware of withdrawals. 3. Financial trails link to close associates; evidence shows transfers to 'Chang E' and subsequent forwarding into the chairwoman's husband's account, requiring detailed police investigation. 4. Withdrawals exceeding 500,000 baht require meeting minutes and resolutions per regulations, so it must be verified whether procedures were followed correctly.
Phuwakorn added that from checking state agency data, the Good Deeds Foundation has not submitted financial statements for the past two years, 2024 and 2025, whereas in 2022 and 2023 financial statements were submitted normally.
Phuwakorn emphasized that the complaint filed this time falls under the offense of public fraud, a criminal offense against the state, which cannot be settled or withdrawn. Regarding foundation committee members rumored to have resigned, he confirmed this has no retroactive effect on liability because the offense has already been completed.
