Poll: Thais Want Genuine Scrutiny After No-Confidence Debate
A Suan Dusit University poll shows 68 percent of Thais are interested in the no-confidence debate, but over half doubt it will effectively check government performance—citizens want serious investigation of allegations and political account
On August 23, 2024, the Surandaj Poll at Suan Dusit University surveyed 1,267 Thai citizens nationwide on their views regarding the government no-confidence debate, conducted online and in the field between August 18-21.
The survey found that 68 percent of respondents showed at least some interest in following the upcoming debate, with 38.28 percent moderately interested and 29.68 percent very interested. When asked which issues they most wanted addressed in the debate, respondents ranked economic hardship and inflation at 80.58 percent, local government corruption at 54.54 percent, energy problems and fuel prices at 53.59 percent, the 400 billion baht loan scheme at 35.04 percent, and parliamentary procedures at 34.25 percent.
However, skepticism prevailed on the debate's impact. Over half of respondents—54.30 percent—did not believe the debate would effectively check the government's performance, while 45.70 percent did believe it would. Regarding hopes for outcomes, 56.99 percent wanted serious and continuous investigation of allegations, 46.25 percent wanted the government to clarify public doubts, and 45.30 percent wanted those involved to accept political responsibility.
When asked about expected changes to Thailand's overall political situation following the debate, half of respondents (50.28 percent) thought little would change, 28.49 percent expected improvement, 14.36 percent were uncertain, and 6.87 percent expected deterioration.
Dr. Peeraphan Korthong, chair of the Surandaj Poll, noted that more than half the public still doubts the debate will provide effective oversight, and most believe the political situation is unlikely to change afterward. What citizens actually expect, he said, is serious follow-up investigation of allegations, clarification of doubts, and acceptance of responsibility by those involved. These outcomes will be the true measure of the debate's political impact.
Nontavat Suwannasakha, a lecturer in law and politics at Suan Dusit University, observed that the poll reflects the public's continued faith in the no-confidence debate as a mechanism for checks and balances, yet their expectation for concrete results beyond parliamentary procedure. Economic hardship, inflation, and bureaucratic corruption remain the chief criteria by which citizens judge government effectiveness and legitimacy.
Citizens also place high value on political accountability, demanding that allegations raised in the debate be investigated and verified with genuine rigor. The no-confidence debate, therefore, should not end with a parliamentary vote but should lead to sustained processes of oversight and evaluation of government performance. The opportunity should be used to strengthen public confidence, legitimacy, accountability, and long-term political stability in Thailand.
