On August 3, 2025, the Office of Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion (OSMEP) released a fact-clarification document regarding the selection process for implementing partners in the "SME Promotion into E-Commerce and Live-Commerce Markets" and "Development and Building of Thailand's E-Commerce Ecosystem for Thai SMEs" projects. This followed a complaint filed by a representative of Silpakorn University through the Democratic Party requesting an investigation into the selection process.

OSMEP emphasized that the selection adhered to Section 34(2) of the SME Promotion Act, which provides the legal framework for projects of this nature and was approved by relevant committees. The office stated it considered not only speed but also the legal framework, project characteristics, and collaboration objectives. Although the method differed from the Central Accounting Office's e-bidding system used for standard government procurement, all steps remained transparent, auditable, and compliant with applicable laws.

Both projects employed clear evaluation criteria announced in advance. Committee members scored independently based on professional expertise without predetermined scores, and selection results were finalized by unanimous committee resolution. To ensure neutrality and transparency, OSMEP appointed a three-part committee comprising independent experts with relevant knowledge and experience, internal OSMEP staff directly or indirectly involved in project implementation, legal specialists, procurement specialists, and monitoring and evaluation staff.

A lottery dispute that has divided a community continues to intensify as the buyer challenges the vendor's contradictory statements. Paa Yom, a regular customer, claims she ordered ticket 287,184 through Paa Daeng, the sister of Paa Mani, the lottery stand owner, via phone based on their long acquaintance. However, no photographic evidence or written confirmation was made. When the ticket won first prize on June 16, 2024, ownership became immediately contested.

Paa Jing initially told media she did not claim the prize and did not know who bought the winning ticket. However, she later admitted to lawyer Paisal Ruettheeth that she had redeemed the prize herself, reasoning that because the first-prize ticket remained in her stand, it must belong to her. This contradicts her earlier denials and conflicts with video recordings in which she stated she did not win.

Paa Yom has never received the ticket numbered 184 she ordered. She notes that Paa Jing's account has shifted repeatedly and is inconsistent. When confronted about verification with the government lottery office, Paa Jing acknowledged she personally claimed the winnings.

Regarding the question of why Paa Yom checked the results around 7 p.m. on the draw day, she explained she was away conducting a mobile community service providing free haircuts with the local district office. When she returned to her beauty shop, customers kept coming. Only in the evening, after a friend messaged asking if she won, did she remember ordering ticket 184. She had won a fifth-prize ticket before, so she messaged Paa Jing but received no reply, only a read receipt.

Paa Yom stated that despite the case now in court, she harbors no personal ill will toward Paa Jing, and they were once close friends who ate together and treated each other like sisters. She had publicly offered 200,000 baht if Paa Jing returned the ticket, a promise she posted online. Yet Paa Jing continues to maintain she did not win.

When asked if she would accept the prize money now, Paa Yom replied it is too late, and she insists the matter follow legal proceedings. She remains confident that she genuinely ordered ticket 184, despite the lack of written proof.

Phitsanulok Provincial Administrative Organization has handed over 35 vehicles to its network of sub-district health promotion hospitals to strengthen proactive health services and improve quality of life for residents.

August 3, 2026 – Montchai Vivatthanathat, governor of Phitsanulok Provincial Administrative Organization, presided over the ceremony to deliver 35 vehicles to sub-district health promotion hospitals (SCHPH) under the organization's administration. The event was attended by executives, departmental heads, directors of all health promotion hospitals, civil servants, and medical and public health personnel.

Montchai stated that the vehicles would be used to support health care services for residents across all areas. The organization is committed to upgrading the quality of services at sub-district health promotion hospitals by ensuring adequate staffing, equipment, tools, and transportation to reach the public quickly and comprehensively.

The vehicles will serve as essential tools for delivering health care opportunities to residents, enabling health personnel to visit homes of patients, elderly citizens, bedridden patients, people with disabilities, residents in remote areas, and provide proactive services throughout communities. Montchai expressed confidence that these 35 vehicles would significantly support health workers in providing efficient care to the public and improving the quality of life for Phitsanulok residents.

Sarphi Hospital in Chiang Mai has released a detailed timeline following a social media controversy over an emergency patient's treatment. A Facebook user posted a video criticizing the hospital after bringing their father, a kidney disease patient experiencing fainting, seizures, foaming at the mouth, and sudden loss of consciousness, to the emergency room. When they arrived at the ambulance bay, the family said staff did not immediately begin treatment, causing them to call for help in distress. The family ultimately decided to transfer the patient to Nakhon Ping Hospital on their own. On August 3, Sarphi Hospital issued a statement with a precise timeline: at 9:47:17 a.m., the ambulance arrived and a relative notified staff at the emergency screening point; at 9:47:50 a.m., a nurse arrived at the vehicle to assess the patient; at 9:48:00 a.m., the nurse called an orderly for assistance; at 9:48:50 a.m., the orderly arrived with a stretcher; and at 9:49:10 a.m., the family drove the patient away from the hospital. The hospital expressed regret for the distress caused and said it would review its communication and service protocols to provide clearer information and continuous care to patients.

On August 3, 2026, the brother of Hlun Solo, a well-known YouTuber, posted an update on Facebook under the account "Klose Mos" regarding arrangements for bringing his brother's remains back to Thailand. He announced that following completion of the initial autopsy in Thailand, the family will proceed with additional autopsy procedures at the Thai Forensic Science Institute to ensure all procedures are conducted thoroughly and transparently. The remains will then be brought home for religious merit-making ceremonies, with the entire process expected to take approximately 1–2 days from arrival in Thailand. Once all arrangements are finalized, the family will announce the date, time, and location of the merit-making ceremony. The family expressed deep gratitude for the continuous support, concern, and assistance received from all sectors, and thanked Chulalongkorn University officials, including Rector Wilaichitr Boorivatton and Dean Pokorn Siriprako, for their support and willingness to host the first night of the merit-making ceremony. The family invited those wishing to help to contribute necessary items for the ceremony, such as tents, tables, chairs, fans, sound systems, lighting, portable restrooms, drinking water, and other supplies. The family emphasized they are not soliciting help but rather opening an opportunity for those who wish to pay their final respects to contribute according to their means and faith. The family thanked everyone for their support and pledged to announce further details as soon as confirmed.

A woman using the alias "B" posted a warning on social media at 7:12 p.m. on August 3, 2025, after being sexually assaulted aboard a flight from Dubai to Bangkok's Don Mueang Airport. The perpetrator was a 30-year-old Pakistani man, and a case is currently under investigation.

B disclosed that she was traveling from Dubai with her 4-year-old daughter. As the plane departed Dubai, the man placed his hand on the armrest of her seat, which struck her as odd. She later fell asleep with her daughter. While sleeping, she felt a hand touching her right buttock and noticed wetness, but initially thought nothing of it since she was covered by a blanket. After sitting up for a while, she noticed the man staring at her continuously and playing with the screen on her armrest.

About an hour and a half before landing in Thailand, B informed a flight attendant of what had happened. The attendant called the man over, and he admitted to the assault, crying and apologizing. B refused to accept his apology and requested police to board the plane and take him into custody for prosecution.

B revealed that a Thai airline employee discovered semen stains on her pants, which shocked her further and made her realize the assault had progressed to completion. She had taken sleeping medication at the beginning of the flight to adjust to the time difference, which caused her to sleep deeply.

B explained that she had originally been assigned a seat next to the man, but seeing he was male, she swapped seats with her daughter to sit in the man's row instead, placing her daughter in her original seat. She expressed horror at the thought of what might have happened had she let her daughter sit in the original seat. Throughout the seven-hour flight after the incident, she felt deeply traumatized.

B confirmed that Tourism Police, the Immigration Bureau, and Don Mueang Police are currently handling the case. The perpetrator remains detained at the Immigration Bureau. She vowed to pursue the case to its fullest extent and seek damages. Authorities stated they will proceed with prosecution and remand the suspect in custody.