The Royal Thai Army has rejected Cambodian claims that bomb craters and damage to archaeological sites prove Thai military strikes violated international law. Army Spokesman Lieutenant General Windhyai Suvaree responded to Cambodia's Information Minister Neth Pichitra, who posted on Facebook claiming that craters, damaged temples, destroyed homes, and Cambodian civilian deaths were evidence of Thai attacks.

The army stated that Thai military operations always follow international law frameworks, with clearly defined and verified targets based on necessity and proportionality, not indiscriminate weapons use. This contrasts with Cambodia's use of weapons that have affected Thai civilian areas, causing deaths, injuries, and property damage.

Thailand's air operations target military threats or positions used to attack Thai forces and civilians, with targets verified before strikes and measures taken to minimize civilian harm. Regarding temple damage, Thailand respects international law protecting archaeological sites but notes that Cambodia has used certain temple areas, including Prasat Ta Kwaai, for military purposes—as firing bases, weapons storage, drone launch sites, and attack positions. When archaeological sites are used for military purposes, their protected status changes under international law, and Thailand has the right to take necessary action to counter threats while minimizing damage.

Containers and barbed wire serve as security barriers to prevent infiltration and reduce confrontations. Past smuggling of explosives by Cambodia led to these preventative measures, not escalation.

General Windhyai emphasized that images and evidence of damage to Thai civilian lives, homes, and property caused by Cambodian weapons are undeniable facts that cannot be erased by propaganda. He called on Cambodia to stop spreading misleading or distorted information and said Thailand welcomes impartial fact-checking using the same standards for both sides.

Surat Thani—Police in Phun Phin District responded to a fatal shooting on August 8 after receiving reports of gunfire at a home in Tambon Phun Phin. Officers found the body of Rong, 37, seated on a chair with two close-range shotgun wounds to the right chest. At the scene, police recovered two spent shotgun casings, three pellets, and a gun pad.

The shooter, identified as Ni, 35, surrendered at the scene with the long-barrel shotgun used in the incident. He is the brother-in-law of the deceased. According to his statement, Rong had a severe drug addiction and had recently returned home from treatment. Upon his return, Rong repeatedly quarreled with their mother-in-law and other household members in front of his three children, despite repeated warnings from Ni, who felt distressed by the behavior's effect on the children.

The incident occurred when Rong asked his mother-in-law for money, and after being refused, struck her. Ni, witnessing this, argued with Rong before grabbing the shotgun and firing two rounds at close range, fatally wounding him. Ni remained at the scene and surrendered to authorities. Police are proceeding with legal charges.

A college student stabbed a 20-year-old Chinese man to death in his girlfriend's room after claiming he was attacked first and did not intend to kill. The victim's relatives nearly attempted vigilante justice as police questioned the suspect.

At 7:10 a.m. on August 8, 2025, Na Jomtien police received a report of a 20-year-old Chinese man fatally stabbed in a rental room in Na Jomtien subdistrict, Sattahip district, Chon Buri province. The victim was found with multiple stab wounds. A 21-year-old woman, identified as Ms. A, was also in the room with injuries and was in a state of shock.

At 2:30 p.m. the same day, Deputy Inspector Adisorn Kop-goy, the investigating officer from Na Jomtien station, led a team to bring Thanachat, 20, a college student in Chon Buri, to his girlfriend's room—the crime scene—to reconstruct the incident and record his confession. He was charged with premeditated murder.

During the reconstruction, Thanachat showed officers where he had discarded the knife behind the room in thick brush. Using a metal detector, police recovered a curved folding knife with a sharp tip, identified as the murder weapon, for forensic examination.

As police brought the suspect to reconstruct the scene, relatives of the deceased Chinese man arrived at the location. Upon learning the news, they wept and grieved. As officers began the reconstruction, the relatives attempted to harm the suspect, but police intervened, controlled the situation, and quickly removed him from the area.

Meanwhile, provincial forensic police examined the crime scene and surrounding areas, collecting evidence from inside the room, the crime scene, and related locations for the case file.

During initial questioning, Thanachat stated he had been dating his girlfriend for approximately three months. On the night of the incident, he had gone to work in Pattaya before returning in the morning to his girlfriend's room. When he opened the door, he found a stranger inside and asked who the man was while holding a knife to threaten him.

The Chinese man allegedly tried to wrestle the knife from his hand and attempted to use it to attack him. A struggle and choking ensued. Thanachat claimed he managed to retrieve the knife and used it to stab the Chinese man multiple times, denying he intended to kill him. After the incident, he fled to Pattaya. When he learned the man had died, he decided to surrender to police.

The 21-year-old woman revealed that she worked as a hotel employee. The victim had visited and come to the hotel regularly. The two had become acquainted and chatted for approximately two months. On the night of the incident, the victim came to her room around midnight, and they talked before both fell asleep.

In the morning, her boyfriend returned and knocked on the door. She opened it, and all three discussed the situation, but an argument broke out and violence ensued. She tried to intervene but was cut by the knife, sustaining multiple wounds. Unable to overpower either man, she witnessed her boyfriend stab the Chinese man until he died.

After the incident, police detained Thanachat and initiated legal proceedings. They accelerated the investigation of related witnesses, reviewed security footage, and collected forensic evidence to proceed with prosecution.

The government has greenlit an expansion of state-to-state (G to G) rice sales to China by a further 220,000 tonnes, while moving ahead to amend the existing agreement and extend delivery until 2026. According to the government office, the Cabinet has approved the increase in rice trading volume under a bilateral agricultural trade memorandum signed on December 19, 2014, as proposed by the Ministry of Commerce. The expansion aligns with China's wishes, with COFCO Corporation seeking to purchase a combined 500,000 tonnes from Thailand—280,000 tonnes from the existing contract and 220,000 tonnes in new purchases. The Ministry of Commerce has been tasked with drafting an amended contract in coordination with the Foreign Ministry, while incorporating views from the Agriculture and Cooperatives Ministry and the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC).

Under the original agreement, Thailand committed to supplying 1 million tonnes of rice to China. To date, the Department of Foreign Trade has delivered rice in eight shipments totaling 720,000 tonnes, with 280,000 tonnes still outstanding. The contract has been amended ten times, and both sides have agreed to modify it to accommodate the additional purchase volume and extend the final delivery deadline to 2026. The Ministry of Commerce noted that this volume increase represents a substantial change from the original framework previously approved by Cabinet, necessitating Cabinet reconsideration before contract amendments proceed. The Cabinet also acknowledged guidelines for G to G rice purchase negotiations and contracts, covering negotiation criteria, payment terms, delivery procedures, contract drafting steps, and information disclosure protocols, to standardize and ensure accountability in government rice trading.

NONTHABURI — On August 8, 2026, a student opened fire at a school while apparently searching for a Thai language teacher, following a dispute over receiving a failing grade in the subject. Classmates reported that the student had previously complained about the zero grade, saying they had submitted all assignments but did not understand why their grade had not been changed. The teacher the student was seeking had been absent the day before the incident; after failing to find the teacher following an initial shooting in Building 5, the student allegedly fired three shots into the air on the fourth floor of Building 4 before a fatal incident occurred. Investigators are examining whether the academic dispute and the student's family background—the student's grandmother was a former teacher—may have been factors in the shooting. Multiple classmates have provided statements to police confirming that the student was indeed looking for the Thai language teacher and that the zero grade was the first such failing mark the student had ever received.