Democrat’s Kariya Slams Bhumjaithai, Calls for Debate
Democrat Party MP Kariya Liewpairoj rebutted Bhumjaithai’s Suppachai Jaisamut, urging him to read details and accusing his party of routinely stirring drama. She highlighted the Democrat Party’s 80‑year history, stressed a forward‑looking vision despite its small parliamentary presence, and set out three criteria for evaluating government performance. Kariya said she is preparing data for a parliamentary debate and hopes for substantive, future‑focused answers from the government.
Kariya Liewpairoj, Democrat Party list MP and deputy leader, hit back at Bhumjaithai’s Suppachai Jaisamut, urging him to read the full details rather than just headlines and mocking the party for its habit of stirring up drama. Dated 16 October 2069, she posted a rebuttal to the Bhumjaithai’s 'stupid, useless, evil' remark, saying she also has a high breaking point and rarely loses her temper, thanked Suppachai and the prime minister for their political experience in reviewing history, and noted the Democrat Party’s 80‑year record of successes and lessons while stressing a forward‑looking vision despite its current 21‑seat strength.
She emphasized that the party’s future orientation is more important than past achievements, saying that having only 21 seats does not worry her because she works as if she had 200 people behind her. Kariya described the current moment not as an end but as a beginning for building a new foundation on the party’s long‑standing ideology of clean politics, a principle she said she learned from senior leader Chuan Leekpai and that remains upheld by figures such as Mark, Korn, and others. She questioned whether Bhumjaithai possesses a comparable ideology.
Kariya outlined three criteria she uses to assess any administration: the capability and intellect of its management team, its ability to manage crises and deliver services to the public, and its commitment to ethics and good governance, especially regarding corruption. She said Suppachai’s lengthy post failed to address any of these points, and she challenged the debt figure he cited, suggesting a unit check.
Looking ahead, she said she and her colleagues are preparing data for the upcoming parliamentary session and hope to hear forward‑looking answers from the government rather than endless exchanges of insults. Kariya added that the public deserves substantive responses, and if the government is not ready to reply now, it can wait for the no‑confidence debate.
