On July 6, 2025, Air Vice Marshal Praphas Saonjai, director of the Thai-Cambodian Joint Information Center (JIC), responded to Cambodia's claims that Thai soldiers were involved in a bombing near Chong Kraeng in Surin province, firmly denying the allegations and stating they contradict facts on the ground.

According to Praphas, an urgent investigation by Thai military units responsible for the area confirmed that no weapons were fired or hand grenades thrown from the Thai side toward Cambodian positions. During the incident, seven Thai soldiers were conducting routine patrol operations to protect road construction in Thai-controlled territory when they encountered Cambodian forces observing the area. They then heard explosions from the Cambodian side and observed rescue efforts, with no weapons used by Thai troops.

Thai military preliminarily assessed that the blast occurred within Cambodian territory and may have involved unexploded ordnance in the area or unfamiliarity of new troops with the terrain and high-risk zones. Thailand emphasized that event analysis must be based on verifiable evidence to avoid unsubstantiated accusations.

"Thai forces confirm internal investigation results showing no weapons use or hand grenades were thrown during that period. Personnel operated under strict rules of engagement and measures to prevent confrontation," Praphas stated.

The JIC director added that the published accusations do not match ground information and could create misunderstandings among the public and international community, affecting border stability. Thailand expressed readiness to support fact-checking through mechanisms agreed by both sides, based on transparency and verifiable evidence.

Praphas further stated that unsubstantiated accusations cannot be used to conclude that Thailand violated the GBC Joint Statement, reaffirming Thailand's strict adherence to the ceasefire agreement, rules of engagement, and international law.

"Thailand calls on Cambodia to use coordination and joint verification mechanisms instead of releasing accusations through public media, which could damage relations and border stability efforts. Thailand is confident that problems should be resolved through bilateral channels based on facts and cooperation to maintain peace and security for both peoples," Praphas concluded.

Future Park and Spell shopping mall invites visitors to experience Thailand's underwater realm at the 36th National Fisheries Day celebration under the theme 'Amazing Aquatic Thailand: Wonders of Thai Waterways.' The country's largest aquatic animal exhibition and fisheries showcase runs from July 3-12 on the ground floor, offering 7,000 square meters of space featuring exhibitions, technology, creative activities, and comprehensive fishing education for all ages.

This year's event received royal patronage when Princess Chulabhorn Walailak presided over the opening ceremony on July 3, presenting awards to competition winners and participating in various activities including an online fish-release ceremony and exhibition viewing.

The 'Amazing Aquatic Thailand' concept showcases the diversity and richness of Thai aquatic resources while promoting conservation and sustainable resource use through modern displays combining technology, lighting, colors, sound, and creative activities. A key highlight is the national beautiful fish competition featuring over 8 species and 81 varieties, including Siamese fighting fish, paradise fish, goldfish, and Asia's first-ever Balloon Molly competition, elevating Thailand's ornamental fish industry to international standards.

The exhibition includes underwater ecosystem displays simulating both freshwater and saltwater environments, telling stories of Thai aquatic life and conservation. Visitor favorites include 'Titan,' a giant crocodile, with daily bare-handed crocodile catching shows and mesmerizing mermaid performances at 1 p.m. and 5 p.m. New interactive features include digital adventure games, competitive fish soccer, and an AR Scan Rally collecting virtual aquatic creatures for special prizes, ensuring entertainment for all ages.

Four zodiac signs are experiencing sudden fortune as money rushes toward them unexpectedly, with blessings falling into place and good news arriving as a surprise. During this period, each person's and each zodiac sign's destiny is shifting—changing for both better and requiring careful attention.

Astrologer Ajarn White reveals the fate of the zodiac signs following Venus's transit on July 6, 2569, naming four signs experiencing sudden windfall with money coming at them unexpectedly.

Rank 1: Aries. With Venus transitioning and the planet of finance aligning with the planet of luck, financial fortune begins from July 6, 2569 onward. Though this period brings many petty troubles and mental disturbances due to your ruling planet transiting the planet of death—with disappointments that lead to better things—the alignment of the financial planet with the luck planet means money rushes toward you unpredictably, not gradually but like a sudden explosion, world-class luck.

Rank 2: Libra. Your ruling planet enters the house of wealth, the spotlight shines on you, and fortune comes crashing in from all directions. Unexpectedly, someone brings you a major opportunity or major connections provide support. Your fortune shines no matter what you do. This period looks favorable to the powerful: "Those with virtue, beauty, and wealth are precise; help animals and fortune follows." Performing merit to aid animals accelerates luck's operation.

Rank 3: Gemini. Venus transits in favorable position and is still fortunate. Though many planets transit retrograde during this period, including your ruling planet, causing stress, health problems, depression, and insomnia for many, when Venus brings you new opportunities and new connections, it's truly the planet of rescue. In the darkest night, starlight shines brightest and guides you to a new, better, more radiant destination.

Rank 4: Cancer. Breaking the year's records with massive change! The energy of the main character about to be cut short is suddenly rescued by the prince's helicopter landing on a pile of gold. This is the genuine phenomenon of "blessings falling from above." In astrology, nothing surpasses having good stars fall on your fortune. When Venus, the planet of money, fully transits into your financial house precisely when life is worst—when money runs out, work disappears—good news arrives as a complete surprise.

BANGKOK — On July 6, 2026, Consumer Protection Police arrested two unlicensed beauty practitioners during raids on two houses in Bangkok and Samut Prakan, where they allegedly offered Botox and filler injections without medical licenses while promoting discounted cosmetic treatments online.

The raids were carried out by officers from the Consumer Protection Police Division (CPPD), working with the Department of Health Service Support under the Ministry of Public Health.

Authorities searched two properties—one in Bueng Kum district, Bangkok, and another in Samrong Nuea, Mueang district, Samut Prakan—after receiving information that both homes had been converted into makeshift cosmetic clinics. Police arrested two women, aged 31 and 25, who allegedly posed as doctors and offered Botox, dermal filler, and skin-enhancing injections despite having no medical licenses. Officers also seized a large quantity of medical supplies and unregistered injectable products.

The 31-year-old suspect admitted she had completed vocational education and worked at beauty clinics for six to seven years before opening her own illegal cosmetic service about two years ago. She told investigators she advertised on Facebook, offering promotional packages ranging from 790 to 4,990 baht. She said she treated two to five customers a day, earning approximately 100,000 to 120,000 baht per month, and purchased injectable products through online platforms.

The second suspect, aged 25, admitted she was not a doctor and had only completed high school. She said she gained experience while working at beauty clinics before starting her own business, initially serving friends before expanding through word-of-mouth referrals. She charged between 1,000 and 5,000 baht per treatment and told police she had operated for about two years, earning around 30,000 baht per month.

Both suspects were charged under the Hospital Act B.E. 2541 (1998) with allowing unlicensed persons to practice medicine at a medical facility. They were handed over to investigators for legal proceedings.

PATTAYA — 6 July 2026, A pickup truck taxi driver in Pattaya has been suspended for seven days after allegedly charging two Thai tourists 300 baht for a shared ride—normally 15 baht for most trips—even though the vehicle was already carrying several other passengers. The tourists said they were shocked by the fare and initially thought the driver was joking.

The Pattaya Transportation Cooperative took disciplinary action after one of the passengers shared the incident on Facebook, alleging they were charged an excessive fare for a trip from Runway Market Pattaya to Terminal 21 at about 23:00 on Sunday, despite the vehicle already being full of passengers.

According to the post, the driver claimed the requested destination required a charter fare. The passenger said they were not seeking a refund or upset about the money itself, but were deeply disappointed by the experience. As frequent visitors to Pattaya who had always encountered friendly locals, they said it was the first time they had felt taken advantage of.

Following the complaint, Thongchai Sukhochai, president of the Pattaya Transportation Cooperative Limited, said the cooperative immediately contacted the passengers to apologise and assure them that strict disciplinary action would be taken in coordination with the Department of Land Transport. He stressed that the cooperative would not protect drivers found to have violated the rules.

Thongchai said the driver was summoned for questioning and initially suspended for seven days, during which the vehicle must remain parked at the cooperative's office with a notice explaining the disciplinary action. The cooperative will also review the driver's disciplinary history before referring the case to the Chon Buri Provincial Land Transport Office for further consideration.

The driver apologised to the two passengers and the public. "It was raining heavily that night, and I am sorry for everything I did that harmed Pattaya's reputation," he said. "I apologise to the public and to the two passengers. I accept the punishment imposed by the cooperative and the transport authorities, and I want the opportunity to make amends."

A woman whose social media post about property damage sparked neighborhood controversy has acknowledged her parking violation was wrong while defending her decision to post about the incident as a legal case example.

On July 2, she parked her car across from a vacant house in her residential area while running errands. Upon returning home, she discovered brick fragments and building debris covering her car's roof. Security camera footage confirmed the material fell from the neighboring property. She attempted to contact the homeowner through community management, but the owner declined to discuss the matter and told her to pursue legal action independently.

After consulting a lawyer who said a lawsuit was possible but would cost more than the vehicle damage, she decided to post about the situation. She intended to raise a legal question about property owner responsibility and building maintenance liability—a situation that could affect any resident. However, public response focused primarily on her parking decision rather than the debris issue.

Regarding the parking criticism, she acknowledges this was a mistake and accepts responsibility, while noting the house was unoccupied and she had no intent to cause trouble. She remains uncertain about the homeowner's legal obligations to maintain the building's structural integrity.

She emphasized that hostile comments attacking her ancestry crossed a line and prompted her defensive posts. She expressed determination to pursue legal action against anyone making defamatory remarks about her family, though she will not pursue comments offering general criticism. She hopes her case becomes a reference point for others and requested legal experts clarify responsibility and liability in similar situations.